![]() ![]() It's an essential substance - and the third-largest source of carbon pollution in the world, ranking behind China and the U.S. ![]() ![]() Carbon capture is touted as a possible solution for heavily polluting sites like oil and gas fields, cement factories, steel mills or power plants run on fossil fuels. While "carbon removal" refers to pulling out emissions humans have already put in the atmosphere, "carbon capture" refers to containing that pollution at the point it's being created - like putting a scrubber on a smokestack. The International Energy Agency last year projected that carbon capture would account for nearly 15% of all the ways that we remove carbon, and the International Panel on Climate Change endorsed it as part of a suite of net-zero CO2 emissions scenarios.Ĭarbon capture is distinct from carbon removal. And lawmakers are debating dramatically increasing funding for carbon capture in the stalled Build Back Better Act.Ĭarbon capture, which removes CO2 emissions from high-polluting sources like industrial facilities or power plants, could play an increasingly important role in global efforts to stave off the worst effects of climate change, according to international regulatory bodies. Last year's infrastructure legislation gave the largest amount of funding ever to carbon capture projects, at $12 billion. While much of President Joe Biden's climate change agenda has stalled in Congress, there is one nascent - and controversial - technology for reducing carbon emissions that has received billions in public funds in 20: Carbon capture. MoneyWatch: Congress ramps up spending on carbon capture projects 05:57 ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |